ARCHIVES OF EDITORIALS

 

 

July 1, 2004

Setting the record straight

The 30th anniversary of Boston’s desegregation decision provided an excellent opportunity for the revisionists to put a more appealing face on the bigots of that day. South Boston City Councilor Jim Kelly insists that the only issue was neighborhood schools.

That is patently false. In the 1960s the black population of Boston began to grow while the white population declined. According to the 1960 census the total population of Boston was 697,197, down from 801,444 a decade earlier. There were 63,156 blacks (9.1%).

However, the black population was concentrated in Roxbury and north Dorchester. Blacks did not object to going to neighborhood schools. The problem was that the school buildings were deteriorating, the schools were overcrowded and there was substantial evidence that financial resources were not equally distributed throughout the system.

In the spring of 1963 the late Ruth Batson, who was then chairwoman of the Education Committee of the NAACP, presented a 14-point list of complaints to the school committee. Among the issues were requests to effectuate the open enrollment plan to allow students to transfer from overcrowded schools, and an acknowledgement that the schools were now “de facto” segregated because of housing patterns.

The school committee at that time included the infamous Louise Day Hicks, Thomas Eisenstadt (a lawyer), Arthur Gartland (an insurance executive), Joseph Lee (a prominent Yankee public official), and William O’Connor (a college professor). While the committee was generally receptive, it refused to acknowledge the existence of de facto segregation or that there might be racial discrimination in the hiring and assignment of teachers.

When the school committee failed to admit the existence of a problem, Rev. James Breeden and Noel Day, with suburban supporters, organized a massive “Boston School Stay Out.” The concern at that time was the quality of education, not racial integration of the schools.

In a racially hostile campaign in 1963 the five incumbents were re-elected to the school committee. In February of 1964 Rev. Breeden led another boycott of the schools and established “Freedom Schools” so that education could continue. Following this, Owen Kiernan, commissioner of the State Board of Education formed a committee to study racial imbalance in Boston schools.

His report published in March 1965 found 45 schools had more than 50 percent non-white students and were therefore racially imbalanced. Hicks, Lee and O’Connor absurdly rejected the report which was based on demonstrable facts. Nonetheless, the state Legislature passed the Racial Imbalance Act in August 1965 to encourage school districts to take measures to eliminate racially concentrated schools.

Despite the law the school committee made no effort to re-assign black students from overcrowded schools that were overwhelmingly black. As a result Ellen Jackson and Elizabeth Johnson launched “Operation Exodus” to provide transportation to seats in underutilized schools in white neighborhoods. Rather than facilitate the transfers the school administration became a hindrance.

After 10 years of frustrating efforts to obtain redress, it became apparent that the heavy-handed policies of the school committee and the administration had crossed the line from “de facto” discrimination to the unconstitutional “de jure” type. Judge W. Arthur Garrity had the integrity and the courage to decide the case properly. The recalcitrance of Boston’s bigots forced Judge Garrity to impose busing, the only remedy that would not require the support of the rabid opponents of schools desegregation to implement.

City Councilor Kelly is indeed no historian.

 

Home Page