ARCHIVES OF EDITORIALS

 

 

November 20, 2003

“All black ain’t coal!”

Older African-Americans take great pride in the elevation of another black person to high office. This is so because of the paucity of professional opportunities during the racially hostile times of their youth. Younger African-Americans, with no such memories, are less likely to be as concerned by such matters. Nonetheless, there is usually considerable ethnic support for an African-American nominated for a seat on a federal court.

The substantial opposition of African-Americans and other liberals to President Bush’s nomination of California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is quite unusual. Her political conservatism has alienated Justice Brown from most of black America.

The Congressional Black Caucus, in condemning Bush’s appointment, stated in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Brown is a “notoriously conservative lawyer and jurist” who is unable to separate her own personal views from “her responsibility to render decisions based on a fair and precedent-based interpretation of the law and the constitution.”

Los Angeles U.S. Representative Diane Watson from Brown’s home state was even more scathing with her criticism. She is reported to have said, “this Bush nominee has such an atrocious civil rights record she makes Clarence Thomas look like Thurgood Marshall.” Opposition to the nomination has also come from a number of labor, women’s rights, civil rights and environmental organizations.

Everyone knows of the importance of the U.S. Supreme Court, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is generally considered to be second in importance only to the U.S. Supreme Court in influencing law and public policy in America. Congress has conferred on the D.C. circuit concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction over the interpretation of many federal statutes and the legality of the regulations of many federal agencies.

Brown is a politically astute nomination for President Bush. With the black vote about 95 percent in opposition to his election, Bush has been trying hard to generate defections from this solid anti-Republican bloc. Brown, a 54-year-old native of Luverne, Alabama, the daughter of sharecroppers, could be attractive to the black community. She moved to California and graduated from California State University in 1974 and UCLA Law School in 1977. She has been a judge in California since 1994 and became the first African American woman justice of the State Supreme Court in 1996.

Brown’s views are so intemperate, right wing, and divergent from the mainstream that the Democrats in the U.S. Senate decided to hold a filibuster to prevent her and two others from being approved. Black conservative Thomas Sowell described this action as a lynching.

It must be remembered, however, that Brown opposes affirmative action or any government preferences; believes that even racially insulting language in the workplace is protected by the First Amendment; supports the firing of older workers when it suits the company; opposes wrongful termination suits of whistle blowers; upholds the right of private property over the rights of citizens; and sees the right to bear arms as inalienable.

Blacks have learned in their ill-advised support of Clarence Thomas that there are some blacks whose views are alien to the common good. The opposition to Janice Brown is a good sign. Now this standard ought to be applied to all black politicians and black public figures.

 

Home Page